Pacific Stock, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.
| Pacific Stock, Inc. |
| Pearson Education, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00423 |
| June 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Copyrights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER DENYING PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 128 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/30/13. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER DENYING PACIFIC STOCK'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DENYING PEARSON EDUCATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 70 ; 75 - - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/26/13. " The court den ies Pacific Stock' motion for partial summary judgment. The court also denies Pearson's motion for summary judgment. Given the dismissal of copyright infringement claims arising out of 20 images (1, 2, 4 to 7, 11, 20, 21, 24, 31, 34, 66, 75, 84, and 86-90), 131 images remain in issue with respect to Pacific Stock's copyright infringement claims. The parties should immediately contact the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case to hold a settlement conference. At the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, the parties may be required to have representatives with settlement authority attend the settlement conference." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to rec eive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 11 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 1/11/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive elect ronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pacific Stock, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pearson Education, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pacific Stock, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Paul Maki |
| Represented By: | J. Stephen Street |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
