Tia v. Paderes et al
Plaintiff: Peter R. Tia
Defendant: Doe Respondents, Department of Public Safety, Linda Rivera, Paderes, Rosen, Mary Tummerello and Halawa Correctional Facility
Case Number: 1:2011cv00459
Filed: July 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST 146 . ~ "Plaintiff's Complaint and action are DISMISSED without prejudice." "The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Pro cedure 24(a)(3)(A), that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith." ~ Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/13/2012. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electron ic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on December 14, 2012.
April 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR "INJUNCTIONAL RELIEF" 79 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 4/10/2012. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER DENYING 56 MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND 57 TO EXPEDITE MATTERS: "Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Order a State of Emergency an d to Expedite Matters is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on February 29, 2012. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT 37 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 2/13/2012. (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DENYING 15 , 14 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on September 29, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electro nic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING 8 IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION AND DISMISSING ACTIONPURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g): 1. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint and this action are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new case accompanied by the full $350.00 filing fee. In light of Plaintiff's litigation history and his failure to concurrently submit the filing fee, Plaintiff shall not be allowed to file anything further in this action other than a notice of appeal. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket any further pleadings, motions, documents, exhibits, etc., submitted by Plaintiff in this action, other than a notice of appeal, as " requests" or "correspondence." Because Plaintiff has not paid for commencing this suit and is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis, the court will take no action on such requests. 4. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to promp tly process any notice of appeal, and to note on the docket that this action was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), 1915A(b), and 1915(g). 5. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED again that he has accumulated three strikes and is he is barred from proc eeding IFP in future federal civil actions or appeals while he is incarcerated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), unless he alleges imminent danger of serious physical injury." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on September 13, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tia v. Paderes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Respondents
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Public Safety
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paderes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Tummerello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Halawa Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter R. Tia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?