Sullivan v. Hendershot
||Joseph W. Sullivan
||April 18, 2012
||Hawaii District Court
||LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
||BARRY M. KURREN
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 30, 2013
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY re: 9 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/30/2013. ~ Order also GRANTS Respondent Dennis Hendershot's MOTION to Dismiss or Deny Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Motion: doc no. 26 ~ (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants regist ered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on October 31, 2013.
|September 11, 2012
ORDER CONSTRUING GROUND ONE OF PETITION AS A 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT A SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on September 10, 2012. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.