Young v. State of Hawaii et al
George K. Young, Jr. |
John Does 1-25, State of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, David M. Louie, County of Hawaii, William P. Kenoi, Hilo County Police Department, Harry S. Kubojiri, Jane Does 1-25, Doe Corporations 1-5 and Doe Entities 1-5 |
1:2012cv00336 |
June 12, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
DAVID ALAN EZRA |
BARRY M. KURREN |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING COUNTY OF HAWAII OFFICIAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 23 AND STATE OF HAWAII DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 25 . Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 11/28/2012. ~ State Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) i s GRANTED. All causes of action against State Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. County Officials Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. The Court dismisses the causes of action against the County and the County Police Department. A ll causes of action against the County Officials, the County, and the County Police Department are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPa rticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.