Cedric Ah Sing v. Dept. of Public Safety

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Hawaii District Court Cedric Ah Sing v. Dept. of Public Safety

Cedric Ah Sing v. Dept. of Public Safety

Plaintiff:	Cedric Ah Sing
Defendant:	Dept. of Public Safety
Case Number:	1:2012cv00599
Filed:	November 5, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge:	BARRY M. KURREN
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 21, 2012	Filing 16 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND 4 AND GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE 9 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 11/20/2012. ~ Excerpt of Conclusion: "This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for t he District of Arizona. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file and send any pending motions or further documents received from Plaintiff to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona." ~ [MOTIONS terminated: Motion fo r Remand and Motion to Change Venue, docket entry nos. 6 and 8 , respectively.] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electron ically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A separate court's certificate of Service will be entered upon the electronic transfer of the case to the District of Arizona.

Date Filed

Document Text

November 21, 2012

Filing 16 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND 4 AND GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE 9 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 11/20/2012. ~ Excerpt of Conclusion: "This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for t he District of Arizona. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file and send any pending motions or further documents received from Plaintiff to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona." ~ [MOTIONS terminated: Motion fo r Remand and Motion to Change Venue, docket entry nos. 6 and 8 , respectively.] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electron ically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A separate court's certificate of Service will be entered upon the electronic transfer of the case to the District of Arizona.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cedric Ah Sing v. Dept. of Public Safety
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedric Ah Sing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dept. of Public Safety
Represented By:	April Luria
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?