Scherling et al v. Countrywide Bank, FSB
| Joseph Marion Scherling, Erlie May Scherling and David Wynn Miller |
| Countrywide Bank, FSB |
| 1:2012cv00671 |
| December 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Maui |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
AMENDED ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND re 4 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/19/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electr onic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Joseph Marion Scherling, Erlie May Scherling and David Wynn Miller shall be served by first class mail at the addresses of record on December 20, 2012.
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/17/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications rec eived this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Joseph Marion Scherling, Erlie May Scherling and David Wynn Miller served by first class mail at the addresses of record on December 18, 2012.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
