Oceanic Companies, Inc. v. General Trades & Services, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Oceanic Companies, Inc.
Defendant: General Trades & Services, Inc. and First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00042
Filed: January 25, 2013
Court: Hawaii District Court
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: ALAN C KAY
Referring Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270 Miller Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oceanic Companies, Inc. v. General Trades & Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oceanic Companies, Inc.
Represented By: Gregg M. Ushiroda
Represented By: Thomas Francis Mana Moriarty
Represented By: Nathan H. Yoshimoto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Trades & Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.