Carroll et al v. County of Maui et al
||Christopher F. Carroll and Duke-Patrick Carroll
||County of Maui, Doe Officer 1, Doe Officer 2 and John Does 3-10
||February 8, 2013
||Hawaii District Court
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 31, 2015
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF MAUI, CHAMP K. WRIGHT, ANSELM T. YAZAKI, AND TRINIDAD ALCONCEL'S 96 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 98 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO LIABILITY OF DEFENDANTS CHAMP K. WRIGHT, ANSELM T. YAZAKI, AND TRINIDAD ALCONCEL. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/31/2015. ~ For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants County of Maui, Champ K. Wright, Anselm T. Yazaki, and Trinidad Alconc el's Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability of Defendants Champ K. Wright, Anselm T. Yazaki, and Trinidad Alconcel. There being no remaining claims in this matter, the Clerk of Court isdirected to close the case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.