Evans v. Leap Frog Group et al
| Brian Evans |
| Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (The), Leah Binder and Leap Frog Group |
| 1:2013cv00269 |
| May 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| XX Outside US |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEE OR COSTS; AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION re 16 , 17 , 22 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUS AN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/30/13. "Evans may file a Third Amended Complaint that is complete in itself (that is, does not incorporate any prior complaint by reference) no later than October 30, 2013. He must also either pay the civil fil ing fee or submit a new IFP. Failure to meet the above deadline shall cause this action to be automatically dismissed." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifica tions received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Brian Evans served by first class mail at the address of record on September 30, 2013. A copy of the court's application to proceed in forma pauperis shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Evans.
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AND WHY APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 7/29/13. "This court now dire cts Evans to file a memorandum showing cause why his Second Amended Complaint should not be dismissed and his latest IFP application should not be denied. The memorandum must be filed by August 15, 2013, and may not exceed 2,500 words (not includi ng any exhibits, declarations, or affidavits)." " Failure to submit the required memorandum shall result in the dismissal of this action." Show Cause Response due by 8/15/2013. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Brian Evans served by first class mail at the address of record on July 30, 2013.
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS AS MOOT re 8 , 9 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 6/26/13. " Evans may file a Secon d Amended Complaint that is complete in itself (that is, does not incorporate any prior complaint by reference) no later than July 12, 2013. He must also either pay the civil filing fee or submit a new IFP. Failure to meet the above deadline shall cause this action to be automatically dismissed. Given the court's dismissal of Evanss Complaint, the court denies Evans's IFP as moot." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Brian Evans served by first class mail at the address of record on June 26, 2013. A copy of the court's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Evans.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
