Lyndon v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
Troy Alan Lyndon |
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (The), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Securities and Exchange Commission and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. |
1:2013cv00367 |
July 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
BARRY M. KURREN |
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS AS MOOT re 1 , 4 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/7/13. "The court dismisses the Complaint and denie s the Application but grants Lyndon leave to amend his Complaint no later than August 30, 2013. If Lyndon amends the Complaint, he must pay the applicable filing fee. Failure to file an AmendedComplaint and either submit a new Application making his pauper status clear or pay the applicable filing fee by August 30, 2013, will result in the automatic dismissal of this action." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Troy ALan Lyndon shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on August 8, 2013. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.