Thomas et al v. The Alcoholic Rehabilitation Services of Hawaii, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas and Deborah Lee Thorpe
Defendant: The Alcoholic Rehabilitation Services of Hawaii, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00176
Filed: April 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Kauai
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge: BARRY M. KURREN
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER GRANTING: (1) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: PLAINTIFF DEBORAH LEE THORPE, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BLAKE SNYDER, DECEASED AND DEBORAH LEE THORPE, INDIVIDUALLY; AND (2) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGM ENT RE: PLAINTIFF MICHAEL THOMAS re 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 04/18/2016. The Thorpe Motion and the Thomas Motion, both filed by Defendant on August 24, 2015, are HEREBY GRANTED. There being no remaining claims, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to close this case on May 9, 2016, unless Plaintiffs file a motion for reconsideration of this Order by May 6, 2016 . (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTION UNDER RULE 11(C)(2) AND RULE 30 AND UNDER MODAL RULES 3.3, 3.4, AND 8.4 MISCONDUCT re 87 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/28/2016. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas et al v. The Alcoholic Rehabilitation Services of Hawaii, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Alcoholic Rehabilitation Services of Hawaii, Inc.
Represented By: Keith K. Kato
Represented By: Gregory K. Markham
Represented By: Mari L. Tsukayama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas
Represented By: Shawn A. Luiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Lee Thorpe
Represented By: Shawn A. Luiz
Represented By: Shawn A. Luiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?