Troxel v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
| Loreen Directo Troxel |
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, John and Jane Doe, Corporations or Other Entities and Does 1-100 inclusive |
| 1:2014cv00342 |
| July 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER re 32 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/02/2015. -- Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Order, filed September 28, 201 5, is HEREBY DENIED. This Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to close this case immediately, pursuant to the September 8, 2015 Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice and the instant Order. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED re 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASH I on 07/30/2015. Deutsche Bank's Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief Can Be Granted, filed March 18, 2015, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as: all of Plaintiff's claims are HEREBY DISMISSED; and the dismissal of Plaintiff's claim under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act is WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED insofar as the dismissal Plaintiff's other claims is WITH OUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, she must do by August 31, 2015, and the amended complaint must comply with the terms of this Order This Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that: if she fails to file her amended complaint by August 31, 2015, this Court will dismiss her case with prejudice; or, if any claim in the amended complaint fails to cure the defects identified in this Order, this Court will dismiss that claim with prejudice. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
