Mather v. Territorial Savings Bank et al
| Diane E. Mather |
| Wayne K.T. Mau, Territorial Savings Bank and Edwin C. Nacino |
| 1:2014cv00391 |
| September 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S RULE 60(b)(4) MOTION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 27 , 28 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/17/2014. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE re: 8 , 10 , 12 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 11/17/2014. [Order furthermore denies plaintiff's Motion to Strike (docket entry no. 17 ) as m oot] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on November 18, 2014.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
