Prime Insurance Company v. State of Hawaii Department of Land And Natural Resources et al
| Prime Insurance Company |
| State of Hawaii Department of Land And Natural Resources, Offshore Risk Management, Offshore Risk Management Insurance Services, ORM Insurance Services, ORM, Inc. and Bruce Woods |
| 1:2014cv00545 |
| December 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' 34 MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND (2) DENYING 37 PLAINTIFF'S COUNTER-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 8/24/2015. ~ Defendants' motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Prime is GRANTED until September 21, 2015 to file second amended complaint in accordance with this order. Prime's Counter-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DE NIED. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
