Shavelson v. Kauai Police Department et al
| Eileen Shavelson |
| Kauai Police Department and Nick Courson |
| 1:2015cv00076 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Kauai |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 30 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/13/2015. "Failure to file a Third Amended Complaint by June 8, 2015, as well as to pay the applicable filing fee or submit an IFP Application, will result in the automatic dismissal of this action." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Eileen Shavelson shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on May 14, 2015. A copy of the court's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form shall be included in the mailing to Ms. Shavelson.
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 24 , 26 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/22/2015. "The court grants Shavelson leave to file a Second Amen ded Complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in this order no later than May 18, 2015. Shavelson may submit another IFP Application at that time." "Failure to file a Second Amended Complaint by May 18, 2015, as well as to pay the ap plicable filing fee or submit an IFP Application, will result in the automatic dismissal of this action." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications re ceived this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Eileen Shavelson served by first class mail at the address of record on April 22, 2015. A copy of the court's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form shall be included in the mailing to Ms. Shavelson.
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 2 , 13 , 19 , 20 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/9/2015. "Shavelson's Complaint is dismissed and the IFP Application is denied as moot. The court grants Shavelson leave to file an Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in this order no later than April 29, 2015. Shavelson may submit another IFP Application at that time. < BR> Any other pending motions in this action are terminated. Shavelson may resurrect such motions after filing an Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in this order. Failure to file an Amended Complaint by April 29, 2015, as well as to pay the applicable filing fee or submit an IFP Application, will result in the automatic dismissal of this action." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electr onic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Eileen Shavelson served by first class mail at the address of record on April 9, 2015. A copy of the court's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form shall be included in the mailing to Ms. Shavelson.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
