Jou v. Adalian et al
Emerson M.F. Jou |
Gregory M. Adalian and Does 1-30 |
1:2015cv00155 |
April 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
HELEN GILLMOR |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 282 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS re: 265 . "Costs are taxed in favor of Defendant in the amount of $4,668.16." Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/6/2018. Findings and Recommendations to Grant in Part and Denying in Part Defendant Gregory M. Adalian's Bill of Costs ("F&R"): ECF 265 . Gregory M. Adalian's Bill of Costs: ECF 252 ; Errata re: Bill of Costs: ECF 254 . Objection to F&R: ECF 276 |
Filing 249 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, ECF NO. 194 , AND DISMISSING ACTION. Excerpt of conclusion: "The Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim, and is DISM ISSED. Because further amendment would be futile, the dismissal is with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Adalian. Any pending Motions are moot."IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIG HT on 4/25/2018. WRITTEN ORDER follows hearing held 2/12/2018. Minutes of hearing: ECF 235 . MOTIONS TERMINATED: 194 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. 200 COUNTER MOTION for Reconsideration re: 67 , 199 . (afc) |
Filing 196 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, ECF NO. 176 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/23/2017. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERV ICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 171 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/PARTIAL SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AND/OR AN FRCP 56(g) ORDER," ECF NO. 127 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/13/2017. (afc)CERTIFIC ATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 67 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DOC. NO. 41, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND ON COUNT THREE re 41 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 9/1/2016. "For the foregoing reasons, Defendant 039;s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Doc. No. 41, is GRANTED -- the First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. The dismissal is with prejudice as to Counts One, Two, and Four. Plaintiff, however, is granted LEAVE TO AMEND as to Count Three. A Second Amended Complaint must be filed within twenty-one days (or by September 22, 2016). If a Second Amended Complaint is not filed by that date, the court will instruct the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in favor of Adalian." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.