DeRosa v. Association of Apartment Owners of The Golf Villas et al
Vincent DeRosa |
Association of Apartment Owners of The Golf Villas, Certified Management, Inc., John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100, Doe Partnerships 1-100 and Doe Entities 1-100 |
1:2015cv00165 |
May 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Maui |
KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 45 Order. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 08/31/2016. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). |
Filing 78 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S MAY 6, 2016 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED ON MARCH 9, 2016, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CERTIFY ISSUES TO HAW AII SUPREME COURT re 49 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 07/20/2016. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). |
Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 05/06/2016. Defendants' Motion for S ummary Judgment, filed March 9, 2016, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as:- Plaintiff's bad faith claim, prima facie tort claim, selective enforcement of governing documents claim, and breach of fid uciary duty claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and - this Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, negligent infliction of emotional distress claim, negligenc e claim, gross negligence claim, Haw. Rev. Stat.§ 514B-105 claim, racketeering claim, and Haw. Rev. Stat.§ 514B-9 claim.The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's breach of contract claim.Although the dispositive motions deadline h as passed, see Rule 16 Scheduling Order, filed 8/3/15 (dkt. no. 23), at 7, this Court GRANTS the parties leave to file motions for summary judgment regarding the remaining breach of contract claim and the Haw. Rev. Stat. § 515-16(1) clai m, which was not addressed in the instant Motion. Any party wishing to file a motion for summary judgment regarding one or both of those claims must do so by May 31, 2016. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.