Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. Chan

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Hawaii District Court Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. Chan

Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. Chan

Plaintiff:	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd.
Defendant:	Michelle Mai Chan
Case Number:	1:2015cv00499
Filed:	December 3, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	BARRY M. KURREN
Presiding Judge:	DERRICK K. WATSON
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2016	Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 30 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN MONEY JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 9/28/2016. -The Court hereby GRANTS the motion for summary judgment, thereby recognizi ng and enforcing the Singapore Judgment against Chan for the following amounts converted to U.S. Dollars: 1. Damages in the amount of Singapore $1,168,450.00, which equates to United States $882,644.79 as of the date of the Singapore Judgme nt; 2. Pre-judgment interest in the sum of Singapore $189,898.10, asprovided in the Singapore Judgment, which equates to United States $143,448.64 as of the date of the Singapore Judgment; and 3. Costs and disbursements in the sum o f Singapore $13,562.58, which equates to United States $7,349.77 as of the date of the Singapore Judgment. 4. The request for post-judgment interest from the date of judgment entered under this motion at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) is GRANTED. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
April 18, 2016	Filing 28 ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 16 MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/18/2016. --Because the Court has personal jurisdiction over Chan with respect to each claim in the Complaint, and because service of process in both Singapore and Hawai'i was sufficient, Chan's motion to dismiss is DENIED. RWS's motion to strike is DENIED AS MOOT. (ecs, )< center>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2016

Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 30 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN MONEY JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 9/28/2016. -The Court hereby GRANTS the motion for summary judgment, thereby recognizi ng and enforcing the Singapore Judgment against Chan for the following amounts converted to U.S. Dollars: 1. Damages in the amount of Singapore $1,168,450.00, which equates to United States $882,644.79 as of the date of the Singapore Judgme nt; 2. Pre-judgment interest in the sum of Singapore $189,898.10, asprovided in the Singapore Judgment, which equates to United States $143,448.64 as of the date of the Singapore Judgment; and 3. Costs and disbursements in the sum o f Singapore $13,562.58, which equates to United States $7,349.77 as of the date of the Singapore Judgment. 4. The request for post-judgment interest from the date of judgment entered under this motion at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) is GRANTED. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

April 18, 2016

Filing 28 ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 16 MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/18/2016. --Because the Court has personal jurisdiction over Chan with respect to each claim in the Complaint, and because service of process in both Singapore and Hawai'i was sufficient, Chan's motion to dismiss is DENIED. RWS's motion to strike is DENIED AS MOOT. (ecs, )< center>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. Chan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd.
Represented By:	Seth T. Buckley
Represented By:	Steven M. Egesdal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Mai Chan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?