Loa v. Lynch et al
Plaintiff: Maui Loa
Defendant: Loretta Lynch and Sally Jewell
Case Number: 1:2016cv00446
Filed: August 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 25 U.S.C. ยง 640
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER: (1) GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 47 ; (2) GRANTING CITY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 51 ; AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE, ECF NO. 53 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICH AEL SEABRIGHT on 8/30/2017. "For the reasons set forth above, the court GRANTS both Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 47, and City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 51. Plaintiff was given two prior opportunit ies to amend his complaint to state a plausible claim. He has been unable to do so, and any further attempt to amend would be futile. The clerk of court is directed to close the case file." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SE RVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Maui Loa shall be served by first class mail to the address of record on August 31, 2017.
December 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION, ECF NO. 28 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/22/2016. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Maui Loa served by first class mail at the address of record on December 22, 2016.
December 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re 16 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/6/2016. "Plaintiff is further GRANTED leave to file an Amended Complaint as to any claims relating to the reque sted relief. An Amended Complaint must be filed by January 6, 2017. If an Amended Complaint is not timely filed, the court will instruct the Clerk to close the action." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Maui Loa served by first class mail at the address of record on December 7, 2016.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loa v. Lynch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maui Loa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loretta Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sally Jewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?