OSF Healthcare System v. Concert Health Plan Insurance Company et al
| OSF Healthcare System |
| Concert Health Plan Insurance Company, Ronald Miller and Robin Miller |
| 1:2008cv01328 |
| November 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Insurance Office |
| Peoria |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Michael M. Mihm |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Plaintiff OSF Healthcare System's Petition to Enforce Summary Judgment Order and for Payment of Costs and Fees 116 , and Defendant Concert Health Plan Insurance Company's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's "Petition to Enforce Summary Judgment and for Payment of Costs and Fees" 119 and Defendant's Request for Judgment Pursuant to Rule 58(d) 120 are DENIED. See written order. THIS CASE REMAINS CLOSED. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
115
OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Byron Cudmore: Defendant Concert Health Plan Insurance Company's Motion to Clarify and Reconsider the Orders of October 4 and October 5, 2011 109 ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order entered by Judge Cudmore on 12/1/2011. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
107
OPINION entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 10/4/11 denying 57 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 66 Motion to Strike ; denying 74 Motion for Leave to File; granting 83 Motion to Strike ; granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 90 Motion to Strike ; denying 95 Motion to Take Deposition ; finding as moot 104 Motion to Strike. All pending motions are denied as moot. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SEE FULL ORDER. (FDT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on 5/5/11. Concert's motion to strike Plaintiff's response to Concert's motionfor summary judgment is granted 64 . Plaintiff's response is stricken 61 with leave to refile by May 13, 2011. By May 13, 2011, Plaintiff is directed to file an amended response to Concert's summary judgment motion that clearly identifies, in separate sections, whether the immaterial facts are disputed or undisputed, and, if disputed, prov ide a cite to evidentiary documentation. Plaintiff is further directed, in its amended response, to delete its questioned facts section and to respond to proposed facts 9, 44 and 49 as required by CDIL-LR 7.1(D)(2)(b). Concert's reply to Plaint iffs response is due May 27, 2011. By May 13, 2011, Plaintiff is directed to refile separately its motion to strike the affidavit of Johny Antony. Separating Plaintiff's response to the summary judgment and its motion to strike into two differe nt documents will help clarify the record. Concert's response to the motion to strike is due May 27, 2011. Plaintiff points out in its response that the certificate of insurance attached as Exhibit C to Concert's motion for summary judgmen t is not thesame document attached to the Complaint and is not the document in effect during the relevant time frame. By May 13, 2011, Concert is directed to file the certificate of insurance that was in effect during the relevant time frame, along with an affidavit authenticating the document and setting forth the dates when it was in effect. By May 13, 2011, Concert is directed to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to Concert's motion for leave to file the affidavit of Deborah Simon. SEE FULL ORDER ATTACHED. (FDT, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
