McArdle v. Peoria School District No 150 et al
| Julie McArdle |
| Peoria School District No 150, Ken Hinton, Thomas Broderick and Mary . Davis |
| 1:2009cv01150 |
| April 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Peoria |
| John A. Gorman |
| Michael M. Mihm |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER granting 57 Davis' Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 58 Individual Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Case Terminated. Plaintiff's request to voluntarily dismiss its claims against Ken Hinton and Thomas Br oderick is accepted, and Ken Hinton and Thomas Broderick are terminated as parties. Plaintiff's request to withdraw her claim under the Whistleblower Act is also accepted, and this claim will be stricken. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/7/2011. (RK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER denying Individual Defendants' 75 Motion to Strike; and denying Defendant Mary Davis's 76 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff is directed, however, to clarify the meaning of the reference to Part II D Paragraph 1-49 and direct the Court and Defendant to the location of this document in the record. Defendants are also afforded an extension to file their replies. These replies are due on 3/4/2011. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 2/25/2011. (RK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
