Hicks v. Hart

Hicks v. Hart

Plaintiff:	Christopher M Hicks
Defendant:	Raymond E Hart
Case Number:	1:2011cv01129
Filed:	March 30, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Peoria Office
County:	McLean
Presiding Judge:	Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge:	Michael M. Mihm
Nature of Suit:	Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 27, 2011	Filing 15 ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 10/27/11 - The Court now adopts the Report and Recommendation 14 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Defendant, United States of America's Motion to Dismiss 10 is GRANTED. This Case is TERMINATED.(SF, ilcd)
July 14, 2011	Filing 9 ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/14/2011 - Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation 8 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Plaintiff Hicks' request to remand the case to state court, to the extent he makes such a request is DENIED. Defendant Hart's and the United States of America's Motion for Substitution of Defendant 6 is GRANTED. The United States of America is substatitued as the sole defendant in this case pursuant to 28 USC § 2679(d)(2). Hereinafter, the caption of the Complaint should name the Defendant as the United States of America. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. cc: Pltf (SF, ilcd) Modified on 7/14/2011 to add cc: (SF, ilcd).

Date Filed

Document Text

October 27, 2011

Filing 15 ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 10/27/11 - The Court now adopts the Report and Recommendation 14 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Defendant, United States of America's Motion to Dismiss 10 is GRANTED. This Case is TERMINATED.(SF, ilcd)

July 14, 2011

Filing 9 ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/14/2011 - Court now adopts the Report & Recommendation 8 of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety. Plaintiff Hicks' request to remand the case to state court, to the extent he makes such a request is DENIED. Defendant Hart's and the United States of America's Motion for Substitution of Defendant 6 is GRANTED. The United States of America is substatitued as the sole defendant in this case pursuant to 28 USC § 2679(d)(2). Hereinafter, the caption of the Complaint should name the Defendant as the United States of America. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. cc: Pltf (SF, ilcd) Modified on 7/14/2011 to add cc: (SF, ilcd).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Hart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond E Hart
Represented By:	Gerard A Brost
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher M Hicks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?