Kayer v. Morgan et al
| Brian Mark Kayer |
| Sgt. Morgan and Unknown Party |
| 1:2014cv01447 |
| November 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jonathan E. Hawley |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MERIT REVIEW ORDER & OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/24/2014: IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for the reasons stated in the full written opinion, and this case is closed. All pending motions are denied a s moot 2 3 . 2) The clerk is directed to enter a judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. 3) The clerk is directed to obtain Plaintiff's trust fund ledgers and to assess the statutorily required fees. 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1) requires Pla intiff to pay the filing fee in installments even though his case is being dismissed. 4) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A mo tion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER AND OPINION)(JRK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
