Evans v. Hillgendorf et al
| Charles Evans |
| Lynn Hillgendorf, S Stewart, Barbaraa King and Stephen Damewood |
| 1:2015cv01043 |
| January 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Perry |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
OPINION - Entered by Judge Sara Darrow on 1/19/2017. See written Order. The motion for summary judgment by Defendants Spencer, Smith, and Lee is granted 24 . By January 31, 2017, Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court, in writing, whether he wis hes to continue with this lawsuit. If Plaintiff does not respond, then this case will be dismissed, with prejudice. Also by January 31, 2017, the parties are directed to notify the Court, in writing, whether they desire to engage in a settlement conference before the trial is scheduled on Plaintiff's remaining claims. The clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Spencer, Smith, and Lee. (LN, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
32
Opinion entered by Judge Sara Darrow on 12/5/2016. See written order. By 1/3/2017, Plaintiff may file a supplemental response to the summary judgment motion regarding his claims against Defendants Spencer, Smith, and Lee.The clerk is directed to keep Defendants motion for summary judgment pending (24). (ED, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
