Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Keirand R. Moore |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
1:2015cv01058 |
February 3, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
McLean |
Sara Darrow |
Jonathan E. Hawley |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 130 OPINION: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Keirand R. Moore's Motion for Summary Judgment 94 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Jury Request 105 is DENIED at moot; Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Events Leading up to and Culminating with Moore's 2012 Demotion and Corresponding Salary Reduction 110 is ALLOWED; Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on all Remaining Claims 114 is ALLOWED; and Defendant's Mo tion to Strike Reply 128 is DENIED as moot. The Court enters summary judgment in favor of Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and against Plaintiff Keirand Moore on all remaining claims. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 1/28/19. (SKN, ilcd) |
Filing 79 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley: Defendant State Farms Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 65 is GRANTED and so Plaintiff Moores EEOC violation and state law wrongful termination claims are DISMISSED. State Farms Motion for Summary J udgment 67 is also GRANTED on Moores state law breach of contract claim based upon a violation of State Farms internal policies. The following claims as articulated in State Farms Motion for Summary Judgment remain: 1) an alleged Family Medical Leave Act violation; 2) retaliation based upon four instances of State Farm action; and 3) race discrimination based on three instances of State Farm action. Entered on 2/23/18. (WG, ilcd) |
Filing 66 ORDER denying 63 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. See full written order. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 7/26/2017. (RT, ilcd) |
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING 58 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration which also GRANTS, in full, 53 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Moore's Assault & Battery and Related Retaliation Claims. See written order. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 06/13/2017. (RT, ilcd) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties are directed to confer regarding the discovery, if any, which still needs to be conducted on the claims remaining in this case and submit a supplemental discovery plan to the Court for consideration on or before January 13, 2017. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/22/16. (WG, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Keirand R. Moore | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.