Coleman v. City of Peoria et al
Christopher Coleman |
City of Peoria, Patrick Rabe, Terry Pyatt, Timothy Anderson and Michael Ford |
1:2015cv01100 |
March 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Peoria |
Sara Darrow |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on September 27, 2016. Defendants' 35 Motion to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery and Trial of Plaintiffs Municipal Liability Claims is DENIED, and Defendants' renewed 52 motion to dismiss Count IV of the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. (SC, ilcd) |
Filing 83 OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena to IDOC and for a Protective Order 66 and Third Party Dana Holland's Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena to the Ill inois Department of Corrections for Audio Recordings of Dana Holland's Telephone Calls 70 are ALLOWED IN PART. The requests to quash the subpoenas are denied; however, the material produced pursuant to the subpoenas shall be Confidential Information subject to the terms of the Confidential Matter Protective Order entered August 17, 2015 30 . See written Opinion. (LB, ilcd) |
Filing 44 ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 23, 2016. Defendant's 22 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and Count IV of Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, for malicious prosecution, is DISMISSED. (SC, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.