Gerk v. CL MEDICAL SARL et al
Alberta Lee Gerk |
CL MEDICAL SARL, CL Medical, Inc. and UROPLASTY, INC. |
1:2015cv01145 |
April 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jonathan E. Hawley |
James E. Shadid |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER AND OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 3/29/2016. The Defendant's 43 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED. Dft CL MEDICAL SARL is directed to answer the amended complaint within 21 days (due 4/19/2016). (RK, ilcd) |
Filing 32 ORDER and OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 12/2/2015. For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's Motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery 24 is denied at this time. Defendant's Motion to dismiss 7 is granted without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 14 days (12/16/2015) curing the identified deficiencies if she has a good-faith basis for doing so. (See Full Written Order and Opinion)(VH, ilcd) |
Filing 27 ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 11 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint re-pleading her claim for breach of implied warranties within 14 days ( Amended Pleadings due by 11/24/2015) if she has a good-faith basis for doing so. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/10/2015. (RK, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.