Gray v. Monicals Pizza Corporation
||Monicals Pizza Corporation
||Nathan D Gray
||May 22, 2013
||Illinois Central District Court
||David G. Bernthal
||Michael P. McCuskey
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 1, 2014
OPINION entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/1/2014. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 40 is GRANTED. The discovery deadline in this case is extended to 5/30/2014. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgm ent 31 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The Motion is granted as to Plaintiff's retaliation claim because Plaintiff conceded he cannot establish a prima facie case of retaliation. The Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plai ntiff's claims of racial harrassment and racial discrimination. Because the discovery deadline has been extended, this court extends the dispositive motion deadline to 6/30/2014. Accordingly, Defendant may file a new Motion for Summary Judgment as to the remaining claims on or before that date. Defendant's Motion to Strike 36 is DENIED. See written opinion. Copy of opinion mailed to pro se plaintiff, Nathan D Gray, 103 Tennessee Avenue, Danville, IL 61832. (DS, ilcd)
|July 24, 2014
OPINION entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/24/2014. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 64 is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This case is terminated. See written order. (KMR, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.