Thorn v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Carol J Thorn
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2015cv02077
Filed: April 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Urbana Office
County: Coles
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Presiding Judge: Eric I. Long
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/16/2016. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 26 is GRANTED. See written order. (JMB, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thorn v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol J Thorn
Represented By: Barry Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?