Earl v. H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co. et al
Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Earl
Defendant: H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co. and John D'Amaro
Case Number: 3:2008cv03224
Filed: October 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Sangamon
Presiding Judge: Charles H. Evans
Presiding Judge: Jeanne E. Scott
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 OPINION (See Written Opinion): THEREFORE, Defendant H.D. Smith's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 74) is GRANTED as to Counts I and II only. Because judgment has been entered on Earl's only federal claims, this Court declines to exercise s upplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Earl's remaining claims, Counts III, IV, VI, and VII, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The dismissal of Counts IV and VI renders D'Amaro's Motion for Summary Judgment on t hose counts moot. Therefore, D'Amaro's Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 79) is DENIED AS MOOT. Earl may refile her state law claims in state court pursuant to § 13-214 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/13-217). Thi s case is CLOSED. The final pretrial conference scheduled for October 3, 2011, and the jury trial scheduled for November 1, 2011, are hereby VACATED. The parties shall be responsible for their own court costs. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/08/2011. (VM, ilcd)
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 11/17/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to File Instanter (d/e 43) is DENIED.(DM, ilcd)
June 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 06/22/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Defendant John D'Amaro's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (d/e 10) is DENIED as to Counts IV and VI and ALLOWED as to Count V. Count V is dismissed without prejudice, but Counts IV and VI remain. (DM, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Earl v. H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Earl
Represented By: Charles S Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John D'Amaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?