Perks v. County of Shelby et al
| Crystal Perks |
| County of Shelby, Michael Miller, Terry B Heiman, Adam D Smith, Moore, Cheryl Anne Woods and Val Rhodes |
| 3:2009cv03154 |
| June 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Shelby |
| Charles H. Evans |
| Richard Mills |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
OPINION: The Cross-Defendants' motion to dismiss the cross-claim foracontribution filed by the Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff [d/e 34] is ALLOWED. This case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Evans for the purpose of scheduling a discovery conference. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 9/15/09. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
36
OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 08/31/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. The Defendant's motion to dismiss Count I [d/e 25] is DENIED. The Defendants' motion to dismiss Counts I, II, IV, V and VI [d/e 29] is DENIED IN PART and ALLO WED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to Counts I and II. The motion is ALLOWED to the extent that the complaint asserts claims against the individual Defendants in their official capacities. The motion as to Counts III and IV is DENIED. The motion as to Count V is DENIED. The motion as to Count VI is ALLOWED, though the Plaintiff may pursue her negligent spoliation claim as derivative of the negligence claim. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
