Moriconi v. Williamson et al
Paul F Moriconi |
Neil Williamson, Travis Koester and Brad Tweryon |
3:2011cv03022 |
January 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Sangamon |
Byron G. Cudmore |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Other Personal Injury |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 OPINION: Plaintiff Paul F. Moriconi's Motion for New Trial (d/e 132 ) is DENIED. SEE Written Opinion. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 4/27/2015. (ME, ilcd) |
Filing 117 OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendant Travis Koester's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence at Trial Regarding any Alleged Other Bad Acts 105 is ALLOWED; Plaintiff Paul F. Moriconi's Motion in Limine for Order Permitting Admission of Other Wrongs or Acts of Defendant 113 is DENIED; and Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Plaintiff's Motion to Preclude Introduction of Infamous Crimes 111 is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. See written order. (LB, ilcd) |
Filing 97 OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 85 is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part; Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 91 is STRICKEN; Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 90 and Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Affidavit 92 are ALLOWED. See written order. (LB, ilcd) |
Filing 84 OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendant Koester's Motion to Bar Testimony, or in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time 82 is ALLOWED. Plaintiff is barred from presenting any testimony by Dr. Robert Ru ssell or any other witness that expresses expert opinions about the Tasers, including whether the Taser shot alleged in the Second Amended Complaint almost killed Moriconi. The request for alternative relief is denied as moot. See written order. (LB, ilcd) |
Filing 42 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/6/2011. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (d/e 40) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Counts III and IV are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint on or before 9/19/2011. Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead on or before 10/3/2011. (MAS, ilcd) |
Filing 32 OPINION: The Court GRANTS the Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal of Complaint Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) and (6) (d/e 23) and DENIES AS MOOT the Motion to Vacate Judgment of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 59(a) and (e) (d/e 24). The Judgment (d/e 19) ent ered April 29, 2011, pursuant to this Court's April 20 and April 28, 2011, orders, is VACATED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (d/e 17) is REINSTATED and Plaintiff is directed to file his response to the Motion to Dismiss by June 13, 2011. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/2/11. (ME, ilcd) |
Filing 30 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/20/2011. (MAS, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.