Walker v. Groot et al
Plaintiff: Frankie N Walker, Sr
Defendant: Guy Groot and Steven Schostak
Case Number: 3:2011cv03033
Filed: February 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Schuyler
Presiding Judge: Harold A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Charles H. Evans
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 169 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/18/2013. (MAS, ilcd)
November 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 138 OPINION as to case scheduling. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/6/2012. (CT, ilcd)
September 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 109 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 09/14/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (1) Plaintiff's motion to enforce the subpoena sent to Forrest Ashby is denied as moot (d/e 95 ). (2) The Court hereby orders the production to Defendants' a ttorney, Theresa Powell, of Plaintiff's clinical and behavioral records dated from December 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009, which are within the possession or control of the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center or the Illinois Department of Human Services. (3) Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' affidavits and hold Defendants in contempt is denied (d/e 98). (DM, ilcd)
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 97 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/23/2012. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied, d/e 76 . Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/19/2012 at 3:30 PM by video conference from Springfield (court to initiate conference) before Judge Sue E. Myerscough. Proposed Final Pretrial Order due fourteen days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference (by 11/5/2012). Jury Selection and Jury Trial set for 1/8/2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 1 in Springfield before Judge Sue E. Myerscough. (MAS, ilcd)
October 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/27/2011. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied (d/e 40). Plaintiff's motion for an extension to respond to Defendants' discovery requests is granted (d/e 4 3). Plaintiff's deadline for responding is October 31, 2011. Plaintiff's motion to issue summonses for the new defendants is denied as moot (d/e 45). Plaintiff's motion (d/e 49) is denied, with leave to renew if he is still unable to access his legal papers. (MAS, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Groot et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guy Groot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Schostak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frankie N Walker, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?