Fuentes v. Shah et al
Plaintiff: David Fuentes
Defendant: Nurse Heather, Vipin Shah and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2011cv03073
Filed: March 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
County: Will
Presiding Judge: Harold A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 101 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 1/17/2012. Plaintiff's motion to compel part of his medical records is granted in part (d/e 84). The motion to strike by Defendants Shah and Williams is denied as moot (d/e 97). Plaintiff's mo tions for leave to file amended complaints are denied (d/e's 87, 99). Pursuant to the Court's order of December 13, 2011, Defendant Ren is dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff's failure to locate her for service. Defendant "John Doe" is terminated, as this Defendant appears to be Defendant Fuqua, who has already been served, and because Plaintiff has failed to otherwise identify John Doe for service. (MAS, ilcd)
November 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/23/2011. (MAS, ilcd)
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/2/2011. Plaintiff's "Motion for Clarification of the Claims" is granted in part and denied in part (d/e 60). The motion is granted to the extent Plaintiff seeks an extension to respond to outstanding discovery requests. Plaintiff shall have until 11/30/2011, to respond to those discovery requests. The motion is otherwise denied. Plaintiff's motion for an extension to respond to discovery requests is denied as moot (d/e 64). The motion filed by Defendants Shah and Williams seeking to extend their response deadline to Plaintiff's discovery requests is granted (d/e 63). Their response to Plaintiff's discovery requests is due November 7, 2011. (MAS, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuentes v. Shah et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Heather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vipin Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Fuentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?