United States of America v. Dominion Energy, Inc. et al
| United States of America |
| Dominion Energy, Inc., Dominion Energy Brayton Point, LLC and Kincaid Generation, LLC |
| 3:2013cv03086 |
| April 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Adams |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 7413 (b) Clean Air Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/15/2014. The Court DENIES Fall River's revised Motion to Intervene, d/e 25 because Fall River does not have a statutory right to intervene under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(b)(1)( B), and cannot meet the requirements for permissive intervention under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b). Therefore, the Motion to Enforce and/or Modify the Consent Decree, d/e 17 , the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction, d/e 15 , and the initial Motion to Intervene, d/e 13 are DENIED AS MOOT. Finally, the Court DENIES Dominion's Motion for Sanctions, d/e 38 after finding that sanctions are not warranted. (MAS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
