Kugler v. Roth

Kugler v. Roth

Plaintiff:	Devin M Kugler
Defendant:	Judith Roth
Case Number:	3:2014cv03085
Filed:	March 25, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Springfield Office
County:	Schuyler
Presiding Judge:	Sue E. Myerscough
Presiding Judge:	Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit:	Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 9, 2016	Filing 68 SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION: Defendant's Motion for Order for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal 57 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motions to Strike 65 66 are DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 55 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. All pending motions not addressed below are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(4). SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/9/2016. (MJ, ilcd)
May 29, 2014	Filing 6 MERIT REVIEW OPINION ( Rule 16 Deadline 7/28/2014). Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted 2 . The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/29/2014. (ME, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 9, 2016

Filing 68 SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION: Defendant's Motion for Order for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal 57 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motions to Strike 65 66 are DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 55 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. All pending motions not addressed below are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(4). SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/9/2016. (MJ, ilcd)

May 29, 2014

Filing 6 MERIT REVIEW OPINION ( Rule 16 Deadline 7/28/2014). Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted 2 . The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/29/2014. (ME, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kugler v. Roth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devin M Kugler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Judith Roth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?