Milsap v. Baker et al
| James Milsap |
| Dr. Baker, Nurse Practitioner, Jeff Korte and Tara Goins |
| 3:2014cv03376 |
| December 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Brown |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 56. 26 This case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal w ith this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 8/10/2016. (GL, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: The clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renew 3 . Plaintiffs motion for a merit review order is denied as moot 6 .(SEE WRITTEN OPINION). Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/24/2015. (GL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
