Community Banc Mortgage Corporation v. North Salem State Bank
| Community Banc Mortgage Corporation |
| North Salem State Bank |
| 3:2015cv03051 |
| February 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION: The Motion to Alter Judgment 57 is GRANTED. The judgment entered July 6, 2017 is VACATED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Defendant. The pending Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Post-Judgment Interest 54 is DENIED AS MOOT. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/02/2017. (SKN, ilcd) (Main Document 64 replaced on 10/2/2017) (SKN, ilcd).
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/3/2017. Defendant North Salem State Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 40 is DENIED and Plaintiff Community Banc Mortgage Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 42 is GRANTED. Judgment to be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $95,289.65 plus prejudgment interest at a rate of 5% per annum from the date of demand and costs of suit. This case is CLOSED. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 39 filed by North Salem State Bank is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 05/30/2017. (SKN, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/10/2015. Plaintiff's Motion to strike Answer and Amended Affirmative Defenses, d/e 23 is DENIED. The Court construes Defendant's Response, d/e 24 as a request for leave to file the Amended Answer and Grants that request. Defendant is granted leave to file the Answer and Amended Affirmative Defenses filed on October 1, 2015. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses (d/e 17 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court strikes Affirmative Defenses Nos. 1, 2, and 8 without prejudice. The Court does not strike Affirmative Defenses Nos. 4 and 5. SEE Written Opinion. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 7/23/2015. (ME, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 10 is DENIED. Defendant shall file an Answer on or before June 8, 2015. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/21/2015. (GL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Community Banc Mortgage Corporation v. North Salem State Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Community Banc Mortgage Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Lorilea Buerkett |
| Represented By: | Emmet Fairfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: North Salem State Bank | |
| Represented By: | Scott J Fandre |
| Represented By: | Tyler Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
