Stewart v. Warnisher et al
| Yvonkia Stewart |
| Chance Warnisher, Amy L Maddox, Springfield Police Department and Kenneth D Winslow |
| 3:2015cv03057 |
| February 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Richard Mills |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
OPINION entered by Judge Richard Mills on 6/14/2017. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, d/e 21 is ALLOWED. The Final Pretrial Conference and trial settings are CANCELED. Judgment to be entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff. Case TERMINATED. (MAS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION and ORDER entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Pro se Plaintiff Yvonkia Stewart's Motion to Substitute the Judge for Cause 24 is DENIED. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION: The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants City of Springfield andKenneth D. Winslow 7 is ALLOWED. The claims asserted against the City of Springfield and Kenneth D. Winslow are Dismissed with Prejudice. The Clerk will terminate the City of Springfield and Kenneth D. Winslow as parties. This action is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins for the purpose of scheduling a discovery conference. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 5/28/2015. (ME, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
