Jackson v. Quinn et al
Samuel Jackson |
Pat Quinn, S. A. Godinez, Guy Pierce, Kess Roberson, Golden and Jeff Short |
3:2015cv03163 |
May 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Springfield Office |
Logan |
Joe Billy McDade |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 10/13/2015. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: The clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Godinez and Quinn. The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma paupe ris petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Ins urance Portability and Accountability Act. Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied (5). Plaintiff appears competent to proceed pro se in light of the relatively simple nature of his claims. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 200 7). He has personal knowledge of the prison conditions and his attempts to rectify those conditions. Additionally, his motion indicates that he has taken some college courses, and his Complaint adequately conveys the factual basis for his claims. See full written Opinion.(JS, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.