Quad Cities Waterkeeper Inc. v. Ballegeer et al
| Quad Cities Waterkeeper Inc. |
| David G. Ballegeer, Ballegeer Trucking Inc, Ballegeer Excavating Inc. and Francis Ballegeer |
| 4:2012cv04075 |
| July 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Henry |
| Sara Darrow |
| John A. Gorman |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on September 29, 2016. Plaintiffs' 122 renewed motion for summary judgment, Defendants' 123 motion for leave to file excess pages in response to it, and Plaintiffs' 126 motion for leave to file excess pages in reply to that are GRANTED. Additionally, the still-pending 105 , 106 , 109 , 110 , 111 motions in limine are MOOT.The parties agreed to a bifurcation of the penalty phase of these proceedings. Accordingly, the Court sets a benc h trial to determine remedies for January 10, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. at the Rock Island courthouse. Final pretrial conference is set for December 2, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. at the Rock Island courthouse. Counsel who will actually try the case are to appear at this conference in person. The agreed proposed final pretrial order is due on November 18, 2016. This order shall conform in form and content to Local Rule 16.1(F). (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on January 22, 2016. Defendants' 94 motion for leave to file excess pages in support of a motion detailing contested facts, and 95 Defendants' motion to supplement the November 3, 2015 minute entry, a re GRANTED IN PART, insofar as they seek admission of the motion and evidence they contain, and DENIED IN PART, insofar as they seek to force Plaintiffs to prove standing at trial. Plaintiffs' 98 renewed motion for summary judgment as to Article III standing is GRANTED. Defendants' 97 motion for reconsideration of the Court's October 27, 2015 Order on questions of Article III standing is DENIED. (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on October 27, 2015. Plaintiffs' 89 Motion for Clarification is GRANTED. Insofar as Plaintiffs' 61 Motion for Summary Judgment was not previously ruled on, it is DENIED. The Court's 88 March 26, 2015 Order on the motions for summary judgment is modified as explained herein. (SC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 26, 2015. The Court DENIES Defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 61 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, GRANTS Plaintiffs' 81 Motio n for Leave to File Excess Pages, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs' 84 Motion to Strike. All three claims of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint remain. However, Defendants cannot claim their activities were authorized under N WPs 13 or 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to strike in paragraph 4 of Slowinskis affidavit, paragraph 3 subparagraphs (c)(f) of Wolterstorff's affidavit, and the entirety of Allen's affidavit. As a result of these rulings, the Court DENIES the parties' Joint Motion for Status Hearing, ECF No. 87. (SC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
