Mendez v. Perla Dental, et al
Plaintiff: Nereida Mendez
Defendant: Perla Dental and Dental Profile
Respondent: Broadway Bank and MB Financial Bank
Case Number: 1:2004cv04159
Filed: June 21, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Samuel Der-Yeghiayan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 698 MOTION by Claimant Perla Dental 26th Street, L.L.C. for judgment (Stein, Lawrence)
June 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 681 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 6/6/2012: Republic Bank's motion to set aside judgment [#667] is granted. The order of contempt and judgment entered against Republic Bank [#622] and this court's memorandum opin ion and order [#623] are vacated. The court adopts the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez [#571] and denies plaintiff's motion for contempt and judgment against Republic Bank [#497]. Reasons are stated in the statement section of this order.Mailed notice(mad, )
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 623 Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 3/7/2012:Mailed notice(mad, )
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 581 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 10/26/2011: Defendants' motion for reassignment of related case [#509] is granted. In court ruling date of 10/27/2011 on motion to reassign case is stricken. See Statement portion of this minute order for further detail. Mailed notice(mad, )
August 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 304 MEMORANDUM Opinion, Signed by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 8/18/2010.(ea, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. Perla Dental, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nereida Mendez
Represented By: Dana L. Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perla Dental
Represented By: Marshall J. Burt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dental Profile
Represented By: Marshall J. Burt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Broadway Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MB Financial Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?