Ruffin v. Armark et al
| Mwamba M. Ruffin |
| Armark and Salvador Godinez |
| 1:2010cv03608 |
| June 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Suzanne B. Conlon |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
WRITTEN Opinion: Defendants' motion to dismiss 49 is granted in part and denied in part. The claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed. Plaintiff may proceed with his individual capacity RLUIPA and First Amendment claims. Defendants Miller and Imhof shall answer Plaintiff's complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. [For further details see order.] Mailed notice. (kj, )
|
|
Filing
14
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 8/3/2010: The Clerk is directed to issue summonses for Defendants Miller and Imhof. Salvador Godinez and Cook County Department of Corrections are dismissed as Defendants. The Clerk shall s end Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 8 is denied. Defendant Godinez's motion for extension of time in which to file answer [#11] is denied as moot. The order granting Defendant Godinez's motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading [#13] is hereby vacated. (See order for further details) Mailed notice (air, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
