Richmond v. Dart et al
| Billy Richmond |
| Collins, Tucker, Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez, Castro and R. Hinton |
| 1:2011cv00065 |
| January 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/20/2013: As stated in th is decision, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants Imhof and Lucas and dismisses the following claims in the third amended comp laint: Count 1 insofar as it alleges section 1983 liability against any individual defendant in his official capacity; Counts 2 through 5; Count 7 except to the extent it alleges a respondeat superior claim against the Sheriff; and Count 8. The case is set for a status hearing on March 26, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. for the purpose of setting a trial date. (mk)
|
|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/11/2012: As stated in this decision, the Court denies defendants' motion for summary judgment to the extent it is based on the defense of failure to exhaust and will conduct a Pavey hearing to decide that issue before dealing with the remainder of the motion. Status hearing set for 12/18/2012 at 9:30 AM. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
