Rotheimer v. Kalata et al
Adam Rotheimer |
Eric Kalata, Stephen Scheller, Marc Bangser, Dan Brown, Michael J. Waller, Paul Warner, Willis S Werner and Mark Curran |
1:2012cv01629 |
March 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
McHenry |
John W. Darrah |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 3/3/2015. Mailed notice (ao,) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 11/6/2013. (tg, ) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order entered by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 4/17/2013. Mailed notice (tlm) |
Filing 27 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 10/18/2012: A Complaint was filed on behalf of Plaintiff Adam Rotheimer on March 6, 2012, alleging seven separate counts against eight Defendants. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, argu ing the Court lacked jurisdiction and that, further, Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court granted the motion to dismiss on the grounds that the Court lacked jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconside ration on July 6, 2012. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 23 is denied. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint on or before November 19, 2012, and a failure to do so will result in a dismissal of the case with prejudice. See statement below. Mailed notice (tlm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.