Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, a voluntary association et al v. Berglund Construction Co.
| Edward Casper and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood Carpenters and Joiners of America |
| Berglund Construction Co. |
| 1:2012cv03604 |
| May 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| George W. Lindberg |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM Opinion and ORDER signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 12/19/2013: For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants plaintiffs motion to reconsider the September 13, 2013 ruling on the parties motions for summary judgment wit h respect to the ADA claim in Count II 77 and vacates the portion of the September 13, 2013 order and judgment [75& 76] pertaining to that claim. Having reconsidered the claim, the Court concludes that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether Berglund violated the ADA, and thus denies plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on that claim, grants defendants motion for summary judgment on that claim and enters judgment in defendants favor on it. This case is terminated. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 9/13/2013: For the reasons set forth above, the Court denies plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment 64 , grants defendant's motion for summary judgment 59 and terminates this case. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable George W. Lindberg on 7/24/2012. Mailed notice(meg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, a voluntary association et al v. Berglund Construction Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Casper | |
| Represented By: | Amy Paluch Epton |
| Represented By: | Terrance Bryan McGann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood Carpenters and Joiners of America | |
| Represented By: | Amy Paluch Epton |
| Represented By: | Terrance Bryan McGann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Berglund Construction Co. | |
| Represented By: | Tom H. Luetkemeyer |
| Represented By: | Scott M Gilbert |
| Represented By: | Leigh Christina Bonsall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
