Smith v. Safeco Insurance

Smith v. Safeco Insurance

Plaintiff:	Rodney Smith
Defendant:	Safeco Insurance
Case Number:	1:2013cv02788
Filed:	April 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Virginia M. Kendall
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2014	Filing 67 ORDER Dismissing Case: Court grants Safecos motion to dismiss and dismisses Smiths Third Amended Complaint with prejudice. Status hearing set for 3/10/2014 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/7/2014.Mailed notice(tsa, )
October 11, 2013	Filing 51 Enter MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, this Court dismisses Smiths corrected amended complaint without prejudice. Further, this Court denies Safecos motion to strike Smiths claim for attorneys fees as moot. Smith has tw enty-eight days from the date of this order to file a third-amended complaint that sets forth factual content that supports an inference that Safeco knowingly violated or recklessly disregarded its obligations under the FCRA. In view of Smiths pro se status, this Court advises Smith that he can file a third-amended complaint only if the factual contentions have evidentiary support, or if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further i nvestigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). This Court further advises Smith that a third-amended complaint, if filed, must stand on its own. Additionally, Smith may consider seeking the assistance of the Pro Se Assistance Program. Smith can make an appointment by calling 312.435.5691 or 312.582.8727. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/11/2013.Mailed notice(tsa, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2014

Filing 67 ORDER Dismissing Case: Court grants Safecos motion to dismiss and dismisses Smiths Third Amended Complaint with prejudice. Status hearing set for 3/10/2014 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/7/2014.Mailed notice(tsa, )

October 11, 2013

Filing 51 Enter MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, this Court dismisses Smiths corrected amended complaint without prejudice. Further, this Court denies Safecos motion to strike Smiths claim for attorneys fees as moot. Smith has tw enty-eight days from the date of this order to file a third-amended complaint that sets forth factual content that supports an inference that Safeco knowingly violated or recklessly disregarded its obligations under the FCRA. In view of Smiths pro se status, this Court advises Smith that he can file a third-amended complaint only if the factual contentions have evidentiary support, or if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further i nvestigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). This Court further advises Smith that a third-amended complaint, if filed, must stand on its own. Additionally, Smith may consider seeking the assistance of the Pro Se Assistance Program. Smith can make an appointment by calling 312.435.5691 or 312.582.8727. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/11/2013.Mailed notice(tsa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Safeco Insurance
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Safeco Insurance
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?