PNC Bank, National Association v. Guzinski Builders, Inc. et al
PNC Bank, National Association |
Guzinski Builders, Inc., Thomas Guzinski, Jane Guzinski and State Bank Of Countryside |
1:2013cv03078 |
April 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
John J. Tharp |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER. PNC's motion for summary judgment 76 is granted in part and denied in part. PNC has demonstrated its right to foreclose on the mortgage, contingent on the final resolution of the remaining affirmative defenses. Judgment is granted for PNC on the Guzinski Defendants' first and second affirmative defenses (no default and IMWL violation) and Count III of the counterclaim (RESPA violation). Partial judgment is also granted on Count foreclosure fees and costs in conn ection with PNCs affirmative foreclosure claim. Summary judgment on the third, fourth, and fifth affirmative defenses I of the counterclaim in that the Court will not enjoin PNC from collecting (ratification, equitable estoppel, and unclean hands), on the remainder of Count I of the counterclaim (declaratory judgment and injunctive relief), and on Counts II and IV (ICFA violation and promissory estoppel) of the counterclaim is denied. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 12/15/2015:Mailed notice(rj, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.