Gonzalez v. Harrington et al

Defendant: Richard Harrington
Plaintiff: Bernardino Gonzalez
Case Number: 1:2013cv03164
Filed: April 26, 2013
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: Harry D. Leinenweber
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 14, 2013 8 Opinion or Order of the Court WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 6/14/2013:The respondent is ordered to answer the petition or otherwise plead within thirty days of the date of this order. The petitioner's motion for attorney representation # 3 is denied as premature. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Harrington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernardino Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.