Conrad v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.

Defendant: Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: Chad Conrad
Case Number: 1:2013cv03780
Filed: May 21, 2013
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Charles P. Kocoras
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 18, 2013 27 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM Opinion Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/18/2013. Mailed notice(yp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conrad v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Malen Spangler, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Conrad
Represented By: Joseph J Siprut
Represented By: Elaine Ryan
Represented By: Aleksandra M. S. Vold
Represented By: Stewart M. Weltman
Represented By: Tyler Zanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.